January 12, 2016

CHINA AND INDIA By Gurudeva Rabindranath Tagore 1937中国与印度

CHINA AND INDIA
Address at the opening, ceremony of Visva Bharati CheenaBhavana
on April 14, 1937
By Gurudeva Rabindranath Tagore

The most memorable fact of human history is that of a path-opening, not for the clearing of a passage for machines or machine guns, but for helping the realization by races of their affinity of minds, their mutual obligation of a common humanity. Such a rare event did happen and the path was built between our people and the Chinese in an age when physical obstruction needed heroic personality to overcome it and the mental barrier a moral power of uncommon magnitude. The two leading races of that age met, not as rivals on the battle-field, each claiming the right to be the sole tyrant on earth, but as noble friends, glorying in their exchange of gifts, then came a slow relapse into isolation, covering up the path with its accumulated dust of indifference. Today our old friends have beckoned to us again, generously helping us to retrace that ancient path obliterated by the inertia of forgetful centuries, and we rejoice.
This is, indeed, a great day for me, a daylong looked for, when I should be able to redeem, on behalf of our people, an ancient pledge implicit in our past, the pledge to maintain the intercourse of culture and friendship between our people and the people of China, an intercourse whose foundations were laid eighteen hundred years back by our ancestors with infinite patience and sacrifice. When I went to China several years ago I felt a touch of that great stream of life that sprang from the heart of India and overflowed across mountain and desert into that distant land, fertilizing the heart of its people. I thought of that great pilgrimage, of those noble heroes, who, for the sake of their faith, their ideal of the liberation of self that leads to the perfect love which unites all beings, risked life and accepted banishment from home and all that was familiar to them. Many perished and left no trace behind. A few were spared to tell their story, a story not of adventurers and trespassers whose heroism has proved a mere romantic excuse for careers of unchecked brigandage, but a story of pilgrims who came to offer their gifts of love and wisdom, a story indelibly recorded in the cultural memory of their hosts. I read it when I was received there as a representative of a revered race and felt proud as I traced the deep marks our ancestors had left behind on their achievements. But I also felt the humiliation of our long lasting evil fate that has obscured for us in an atmosphere of insanity the great human value of a noble endeavour, one of the most precious in the history of man.
I told my Chinese hosts on that occasion: "My friends, I have come to ask you to re-open the channel of communication which I hope is still there; for though overgrown with weeds of oblivion, its lines can still be traced. I have not the same voice that my ancestors had. I have not the wisdom they possessed. My life has not attained that consciousness of fulfilment needed to make this message fruitful. We in India are a defeated race; we have no power, political, military or commercial; we do not know how to help you or injure you materially. But, fortunately, we can still meet you as your guests, your hosts, your brothers and your friends. Let that happen. I invite you to us as you have invited me. I do not know whether you have heard of the institution I have established in my land. Its one object is to let India welcome the world to its heart. Let what seems a barrier become a path, and let us unite, not in spite of our differences, but through them. For differences can never be wiped away, and life would be so much the poorer without them. Let all human races keep their own personalities, and yet come together, not in a uniformity that is dead, but in a unity that is living".
That has happened and friends are here from China with their gift of friendship and co-operation. The Hall which is to be opened today will serve both as the nucleus and as a symbol of that larger understanding that is to grow with time. Here students and scholars will come from China and live as part of ourselves, sharing our life and letting us share theirs, and by offering their labours in a common cause, help in slowly re-building that great course of fruitful contact between our peoples, that has been interrupted for ten centuries. For this Visva-Bharati is, and will, I hope, remain a meeting place for individuals from all countries, east or west, who believe in the unity of mankind and are prepared to suffer for their faith. I believe in such individuals even though their efforts may appear to be too insignificant to be recorded in history.
It might be supposed that in a world so closely knit by railways, steamships and air lines, where almost every big city is cosmopolitan, such special invitations for contact are superfluous. But, unfortunately, the contacts that are being made today have done more to estrange and alienate peoples from one another than physical inaccessibility ever did. We are discovering for ourselves the painful truth that nothing divides so much as the wrong kind of nearness. People seem to be coming in each other's way, dodging and trapping one another, without ever coming together. We meet others, either as tourists when we merely slide against the surface of their life, entering hotels only to disappear from their land, or as exploiters in one disguise or another. We are living in a world where nations are divided into two main groups those who trample on others' freedom, and those who are unable to guard their own; so that while we have too much of intrusion on others' rights, we have hardly any intercourse with her culture. It is a terrorised world, dark with fear and suspicion, where peaceful races in dread of predatory hordes are retreating into isolation for security.
I am reminded of my experience as we were travelling up from Shanghai to Nanking along the great river, Yang Tse. All through the night I kept on coming out of my cabin to watch the beautiful scene on the banks, the sleeping cottages with their solitary lamps, the silence spread over the hills, dim with mist. When morning broke and brought into view fleets of boats coming down the river, their sails stretching high into the air, a picture of life's activity with its perfect grace of freedom, I was deeply moved and felt that my own sail had caught the wind and was carrying me from captivity, from the sleeping past, out into the great world of man. It brought to my mind different stages of the history of man's progress.
In the night each village was self-centered, each cottage stood bound by the chain of unconsciousness. I knew, as I gazed on the scene, that vague dreams were floating about in this atmosphere of sleeping souls, but what struck my mind more forcibly was the fact that when men are asleep they are shut up within the very narrow limits of their own individual lives. The lamps exclusively belonged to the cottages, which in their darkness were in perfect isolation. Perhaps, though I could not see them, some prowling bands of thieves were the only persons awake, ready to exploit the weakness of those who were asleep.
When daylight breaks we are free from the enclosure and the exclusiveness of our individual life. It is then that we see the light which is for all men and for all times. It is then that we come to know each other and come to co-operate in the field of life. This was the message that was brought in the morning by the swiftly moving boats. It was the freedom of life in their outspread sails that spoke to me; and I felt glad. I hoped and prayed that morning had truly come in. the human world and that the light had broken forth.
This age to which we belong, does it not still represent night in the human world, a world asleep, whilst individual races are shut up within their own limits, calling themselves nations, which barricade themselves, as these sleeping cottages were barricaded with shut doors, with bolts and bars, with prohibitions of all kinds? Does not all this represent the dark age of civilization, and have we not begun to realize that it is the robbers who are out and awake?
But I do not despair. As the early bird, even while the dawn is yet dark, sings out and proclaims the rising of the sun, so my heart sings to proclaim the coming of a great future which is already close upon us. We must be ready to welcome this new age. There are some people, who are proud and wise and practical, who say that it is not in human nature to be generous, that men will always fight one another, that the strong will conquer the weak and that there can be no real moral foundation for man's civilization. We cannot deny the facts of their assertion that the strong have their rule in the human world: but I refuse to accept this as a revelation of truth.
It is co-operation and love, mutual trust and mutual aid which make for strength and real merit of civilization. New spiritual I and moral power must continually be developed to enable men to assimilate their scientific gains, to control their weapons and machines, or these will dominate and enslave them. 1 know that many will point to the weakness of China and India and tell us that thrown as we are among other ruthlessly strong and aggressive world peoples, it is necessary to emphasize power and progress in order to avoid destruction. It is indeed true that we are weak and disorganized, at the mercy of every barbaric force, but that is not because of our love of peace but because we no longer pay the price of our faith by dying for it. We must learn tom defend our humanity against the insolence of the strong, only taking care that we do not imitate their ways and, by turning ourselves brutal, destroy those very values which alone make our humanity worth defending. For danger is not only of the enemy without but of the treason within us. We had, for over a century, been so successfully hypnotised and dragged by the prosperous West behind its chariot that, though choked by the dust, deafened by the noise, humbled by our helplessness, overwhelmed by speed, we yet agreed to acknowledge that this chariot-drive was progress, and that progress was civilization. If we ever ventured to ask, however humbly: Progress towards what, and progress for whom? It was considered to be peculiarly and ridiculously oriental to entertain such doubts about the absoluteness of progress. It is only of late that a voice has been heeded by us, bidding us take account not only of the scientific perfection of the chariot, but of the depth of ditches lying across its path. Today we are emboldened to ask: what is the value of progress if it makes a desert of this beautiful world of man? And though we speak as members of a nation that is humiliated and oppressed and lies bleeding in the dust, we must never acknowledge the defeat, the last insult, the utter ruin of our spirit being conquered, of our faith being sold. We need to hear again and again, and never more than in this modern world of bead-hunting and cannibalism in disguise that: - By the help of unrighteousness men do prosper, men do gain victories over their enemies, men do attain what they desire, but they perish at the root.
It is to this privilege of preserving, not the mere body of our customs and conventions, but the moral force which has given quality to our civilization and made it worthy of being honoured, that I invite the co-operation of the people of China, recalling the profound words of their sage, Lao-tze [Laozi: Those who have virtueattend to their obligations, those who have no virtue attend to their claims. Progress which is not related to an inner ideal, but to an attraction which is external, seeks to satisfy endless claims. But civilization, which is an ideal, gives us power and joy to fulfil our obligations.
Let us therefore abide by our obligation to maintain and nourish the distinctive merit of our respective cultures and not to be misled into believing that what is ancient is necessarily outworn and what is modern is indispensable. When we class things as modern or old we make a great mistake in following our calendar of dates. We know that the flowers of Spring are old, that they represent the dawn of life on earth, --- but are they therefore symbols of the dead and discarded? Would we rather replace them with artificial flowers made of rags, because they were made "yesterday"? It is not what is old or what is modern that we should love and cherish but what has truly a permanent human value. And can anything be more worthy of being cherished than the beautiful spirit of the Chinese culture that has made the people love material things without the strain of greed, that has made them love the things of this earth, clothe them with tender grace without turning them materialistic? They have instinctively grasped the secret of the rhythm of things, not the secret of power that is in science, but the secret of expression, This is a great gift, for God alone knows this secret. I envy them this gift and wish our people could share it with them.

I do not know what distinctive merit we have which our Chinese friends and others may wish to share. Once indeed our sages dedicated themselves to the ideal of perfect sympathy and intellect, in order to win absolute freedom through wisdom and absolute love through pity. Today we cannot boast of either such wisdom or such magnanimity of heart. But I hope we are not yet reduced to such absolute penury of both as not to be able to offer at least a genuine atmosphere of hospitality, of an earnestness to cross over our limitations and move nearer to the hearts of other peoples and understand somewhat of the significance of the endless variety of man's creative effort.

中国与印度
——在国际大学中国学院成立仪式上的演讲
泰戈尔
1937414日)

人类历史最令人难忘的事件是开辟道路。这当然不是为机器或机关枪开道,而是为帮助不同的种族达到思想认识的一致,履行彼此承担的体现共同人性的责任。这种为数不多的事件以前发生过,印度人民和中国人民之间曾经修筑交往的大道。在那个年代,全凭个人的英雄气概跨越高山恶水,需有非凡的恢弘气魄克服疑虑、惶惑。两个处于领先地位的国家相逢之时,不是战场上的死敌,宣称自己拥有成为世界霸主的权力;而是文雅的朋友,无比欣慰地交换礼品。之后,出现了缓慢的衰退,两国处于隔绝的状态,交往的大道蒙上了互不关心的厚尘。今天我们的老朋友再次向我们发出呼吁,不遗余力地协助我们重新踏上被遗忘了的世纪的疏懒所抹去的古道。我们为此感到欢欣鼓舞。
对我来说,今天是一个期待已久的伟大日子。我可以代表印度人民,发出消隐在昔年里的古老誓言---巩固中印两国人民文化交流和友谊的誓言。远在一千八百年前,我们的祖先以无限的忍耐力和牺牲精神,为这种交流奠定了基础。十几年前,我应邀前往中国访问的时候,我感觉到从印度之心喷涌而出的生命的洪流,漫过山岳,漫过沙漠,流到迢遥的边陲,滋养了印度人民的心田。我想起神圣的朝觐途中那些一往无前的英雄,忠于信仰,怀着超越自身,培育连结万民的至爱的理想,舍生忘死,饱受远离家庭和亲人的痛苦。他们多数人泯逝了,未留下一丝痕迹。只有少数人对后人讲述了他们的故事。这不是冒险家或侵略者的故事,冒险家和侵略者吹嘘的“壮举”,不过是为无从稽考的劫掠生涯进行带有浪漫色彩的狡辩,这是朝觐者赠送爱和智慧的礼品的故事,铭刻在接待他们的主人的文化记忆中的不可磨灭的故事。我读着这个故事,作为备受尊敬的民族的代表,在中国受到热烈欢迎。我为能循着先辈成就的深痕前进而感到骄傲,同时我感到惭愧的是,在虚无主义的氛围中,长期的厄运黯淡了人类历史的珍奇之一---崇高的奋斗所蕴含的巨大的人道主义价值。
我在为我举行的欢迎集会上对中国主人说:“朋友们,我前来请你们疏通我相信依然存在的交往的道路。尽管路上蔓生着忘却的荒草,它的走向仍依稀可辨。我没有先人那样的感召力,也没有他们那样的聪慧,完成这个使命的构想在我心里尚未成熟。我们印度是一个被打败的国家,我们没有政权、军权,也没有贸易权。在物质上我们不晓得怎样帮助你们,自然也不会损害你们。但我们可以荣幸地和你们欢聚,作为你们的客人,作为你们的东道主,作为你们的兄弟和挚友。让我们常来常往,我邀请你们,一如你们邀请我。我不清楚你们是否听说我在本国创办的学校。它的宗旨之一,是敞开印度的胸怀迎接世界。让貌似的关隘变为通途吧,愿我们不忌讳差异,恰恰在承认差异的基础上团结起来!差异永远不会消除,没有差异,生命反倒赢弱,让所有种族保持各自的特质,汇合于鲜活的统一之中,而不是僵死的单一之中。”
我说的那番话今天终于实现了。在座的中国朋友带来了友谊和合作的礼物。作为随着时间的推移不断增长的理解的核心和象征,过一会儿将揭幕的中国学院,将发挥积极作用。中国的学生和学者将作为我们的成员住在这儿,他们的生活与我们的生活水乳交融。他们将为共同的事业付出辛勤的劳动,帮助逐步修得中印两国人民之间业已中断十个世纪、富于成果的康庄大道。至于国际大学,我希望现在和将来它是各国人士聚会的场所,不管来自东方,还是西方,只要他们坚信人类的团结,决意为自己的信仰忍受艰苦。我信赖他们,纵使他们的探索或许并非意义得大而未能载入史册。
也许有人认为火车、轮船、飞机已经把世界紧紧连在一起,几乎每座城市已是国际都市,我们发出旨在加强联系的特殊邀请,纯粹是多此一举。然而,不幸的是,正是渐渐形成的那种联系,在使人们疏远和分离方面,大大超过先前的天然屏障。我们发现的令人痛心的事实是,最能分隔人们的莫过于那种错误的现代比邻。人们走上同一条路,哐互相躲避,或互相陷害,总也走不到一块儿。人与人相遇,或是乔装打扮的剥削者,或是行客,扫一眼他人的生活表层,步入旅店,便从他人的土地上消失了。我们所在的世界上,民族分为两类:一类民族践踏他人的自由,一类民族无力保卫自己。所以,我们倘若过多地干预他人的权利,就难以他们开展文化交流。当今这个恐怖的世界上,弥漫着惶遽和猜疑的黑暗。爱好和平的民族畏惧一群群掠夺者,退入隔绝的境地,以确保安全。
我至今清楚地记得我们乘船离开上海,沿着浩荡的长江前往南京的情景。我通宵待在客舱外面,欣赏两岸幽美的夜景。入睡的农舍里,闪烁着浇寞的灯光,烟雾迷蒙的丘陵沉浸在静谧中。清晨,举目望去,一艘艘木船长起白帆,涨满风,在江面上疾驶。这幅生命自由运动的壮丽画卷,多么赏心悦目!我陶醉了,我感受到我的生命之舟也扬帆飞驰,载着我冲出樊篱,冲出昏眠的昔日,进入广阔的人类世界,载着我游历了人类历史发展的各个阶段。
深夜,一座村庄是一个中心,每一幢默立着的农舍被麻痹了的意识的链子缠捆着。我猜想我观赏夜景之时,那些沉睡的灵魂周遭浮荡着离奇的梦。令我的心强烈震颤的是,人们酣眠之时,局限在多么狭窄的个人生活的圈子里啊!沉入黑暗和无忧的寂静中的民房,只有孤灯相伴。我看不见的惟一的清醒者,大概是鬼鬼祟祟的窃贼,趁人沉睡干着不光彩的勾当。
明灿的曙光中,我们跨出个人生活的圈子。然后,沐着普照古今、普照芸芸众生的阳光,在生活领域中互相了解,互相合作。这是破浪前进的航船厂捎给黎明的喜讯,也是舒张的风帆对我描述的生命的自由,我为此感奋不已。我衷心祝愿真正的的黎明降临人类世界,金色的阳光永远普照大地。
我们所处的时代依旧代表昏睡的人类世界的黑夜?各个国家囿于各自的疆域,名义上是国家,却像入睡的锁闭的民宅,用门闩、插销、各种律条禁锢自己?这些莫非反映文明的黑暗时期?我们尚未识破在户外清醒地活动的是盗贼?
然而,我毫不沮丧。正如天空尚未破晓,晨鸟歌唱着宣告旭日在升起,我的心歌唱着宣告,伟大的未来正向我们走来,离我们很近了。我们应当准备迎接这个新时代。
某些聪明、傲岸、务实的人说,心地善良不是人的本性。古往今来,人类互相厮杀,强者征服弱者。人类文明不可能有货真价实的道德基础。我们无法否认他们列举的事实,强者统治着人类世界。但我拒绝承认这揭示了真理。
惟有合作、友爱,互相信任,互相帮助,能使文明显示真正的伟大价值。当前,应该继续加强精神和道义的力量,以促使人们协调科学方面的利益,控制、驾御武器的军备。
我知道有些人会指出中国和印度的弱点,警告我们,我们已被无情地抛入世界上强悍的侵略者中间。为免遭灭亡,增强实力、推动进步刻不容缓。确实,我们没有组织起来,软弱可欺,是野蛮势力怜悯的对象。根本原因不是我们对和平的热爱,而是我们不再为我们的信仰付出死的代价。我们务必学会保卫自身的人格,反对强暴者的横行霸道,注意不走他们的老路,不使自己性情残暴,不去毁掉那确保我们的人格值得保护的真正价值。
危险不独来自外部的敌人,也来自我们内部的背叛。一个多世纪以来,繁荣的西方的马车后面,灰尘呛鼻,喧声震耳。孤立无助中,我们唯唯诺诺,飞驰的车轮把我们压倒,我们被有效地蛊惑,被摆布,依然同意承认那驾车的娴熟体现进步,进步即文明。如果我们鼓足勇气问一句:”这种进步的目的何在?是为何人?”则会被认为是东方人狂妄可笑地对绝对的进步持怀疑态度。不过,前些日子,我们耳朵里传进了另一种声音:你们不要只关注那四轮马车具有完美的科学性,也要考虑路上挖的堑壕的深度。今日,我们大胆诘问:“这种进步若使美好的人类世界变为漫漫荒漠,它有何价值?”虽然我们作为受压迫受欺侮的、在尘埃中流血的民族的一员说话,但我们绝不承认失败,不接受无休止的凌辱,不认为受压抑的民族精神和被出卖的信仰已经沦丧。
我们应该经常收听这样的消息:靠别人撑腰,有的人腰缠万贯,有的人战胜了对手,有的人捞到贪图的一切,但是终都走向了灭亡。传出这类消息最多的地方,是打着各种幌子猎取人头、啖食人肉的现代世界。
特别需要加以维护的,不是风俗习惯,而是道德力量。道德力量能够提高我们文明的质量,使之受到广泛尊重。所以,我请求中国人民给予合作。我愿援引中国的先哲老子的一句名言:有德司契,无德司彻。与内在理想无关而与外在诱惑钩连的所谓进步,追寻着无穷利欲的满足。然而文明是一种理想,能给予我们尽责的力量和快乐。
让我们坚持不懈地履行职责,保护并提高各自文化的特殊价值。不可盲目地相信:古老的尽是破烂,现代的样样是珍品。我们把现代和古老的东西分门别类的时候,往往按照年份,这是个大错误。众所周知,春天的鲜花是古代繁衍下来的,象征着大地的生命的黎明,它难道是泯逝之物或废物的标记?因为绢花是“昨天”制作的,就可取代春天的鲜花?我们爱惜的应具有人类恒久的价值,不管它是古老的还是现代的。优秀的文化精神,使中国人民无私的钟爱万物,热爱人世的一切,赋予他们善良谦和的秉性,而未把人们变为物欲主义者。还有什么比这更值得珍惜的呢?他们本能地抓住了事物的韵律的奥秘,即情感表现的奥秘,而不是科学孕育的权势的奥秘。这惟独天帝深谙的奥秘,是一份珍贵的礼品。我羡慕他们,但愿印度人民能分享这份礼品。
我不清楚中国和其他国家的朋友期盼分享我们哪些卓越的成就。印度的先哲献身于智能和行善的理想,以聪明才智获得解脱,以同情获得至爱。如今,我们不应该夸耀他们的智力和爱心。我只希望这些在我们身上尚未衰竭到使我们无力创造一个环境去热诚地接待嘉宾,去超越自我更加贴近其他国家的人民的心,去认识人类无止境的创造性工作的深远意义。



October 10, 2014

Pan-Democrats in Hong Kong tiptoeing on a thread, by Li Xiaojun, New Delhi Times, September 30, 2014

http://www.newdelhitimes.com/pan-democrats-in-hong-kong-tiptoeing-on-a-thread/





Pan-Democrats in Hong Kong tiptoeing on a thread

SHARE THIS
TAGS
Occupy Central with Love & Peace (OCLP) demonstration driven by pan-democrats in Hong Kong turned violent on early September 28. Protesters, mainly middle school students and college students, broke the police cordon guarding the government headquarters. The police had to use teargas and pepper spray to disperse the crowds. And rumors spread like virus on social media that the police shot the masses using rubber bullets and that the PLA troops were set to step in. Worried parents and grandparents rushed to the streets to look for their children. This in turn blocked the police movement on the streets. Traffic jams and chaos were unavoidable. The situation seemed spin out of control next day. The violent protesters seemed forget where they should go. On September 29, many primary and middle schools had to be closed. Foreign and Chinese mainland tourists were caught in the uninvited trouble.
But the underlying facts are: the majority of Hong Kong people are against Occupy Central. No business tycoon supports it except Jimmy Lai, the owner of an anti-Beijing media group. The judicial independence of Hong Kong has not been encroached upon since its handover to China on July 1, 1997. No single case was referred to Beijing in the past 17 years. Britain’s top judge, David Neuberger, said on August 26 that he “could see no evidence that judicial independence in Hong Kong had been eroded”. No tax in any form was collected by the central government from Hong Kong. Hong Kong people look after their health, education, religious and many other affairs by themselves except for defense and foreign affairs. Hong Kong people only got to know the taste of democracy after 155 years of colonization by the British who only appointed governors for Hong Kong.
Turning a blind eye to such progress, the demonstrators called for “real autonomy” and public nomination for the universal suffrage of the chief executive of Hong Kong in 2017. The pan-democrats are bringing the political process in Hong Kong to a dead-end. Their dream is to turn Hong Kong into an independent or semi-independent political entity which is doomed to failure.
Occupy Central to destabilize the economy
The Chinese Constitution and the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China (HKSAR) provide Hong Kong with three formulas, namely the “one country, two systems,” “Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong” and a high degree of autonomy. Hong Kong’s democracy and capitalist economy developed smoothly since the handover in 1997. The General Regional Product (GRP) rose from HK$ 1.37 trillion in 1997 to HK$ 2.12 trillion in 2013. It is the 7 million Hong Kong people who have benefited the most.
Today, the pan-democrats claim that they are fighting for real autonomy, judicial independence and rule of law. But they are breaking the law at first place. Usually Hong Kong people protest in the Victoria Park, like Delhities protest in Jantar Matar area. Nobody has protested in the Central since Hong Kong was handed back to China. The Central, or the Central Circle, is Hong Kong’s nerve center where the headquarters of the administration, the legislative council, the military, international banks, stock exchange locate. In another name, it is the central business district of Hong Kong. So the hidden agenda of Occupy Central is to destabilize the Hong Kong economy to put pressure upon Beijing. Hong Kong receives more than 5 crore inbound tourists in 2013 and over 4 crore of them are from mainland China. The tourism industry is ready to host one million mainland tourists during the National Day Holiday October 1-7. The industry might suffer in view of the current situation. But the pan-democrats do not care about this. On the contrary they want to take advantage of this. The protestors’ declared target is to force the National People’s Congress (NPC), China’s top legislature, to take back its decision on universal suffrage for HKSAR chief selection in 2017. The decision does not fall down from the sky. It is based on many rounds of consultations spearheaded by Hong Kong chief executive Leung Chun-ying. The decision is legally binding. No doubt, this is also pan-democrats’ unlawful claim. It is unrealistic and naive to force the top legislature to bite the dirt. In a word, Occupy Central is a lawless activity.
The NPC Decision
The Basic Law of Hong Kong explicitly stipulates that the chief executive and all the members of the Legislative Council must be elected by universal suffrage, making universal suffrage a legal objective.
The decision of the standing committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC) on August 31 prescribes that 2-3 candidates for the universal suffrage must be nominated by the majority of a 1200 member of Election Committee. The members should come from the four major sectors of “industry, commerce and finance,” ”the professions,” “labor, social services, religious and other sectors” and “members of the Legislative Council, representatives of district boards and Heung Yee Kuk, HKSAR deputies to the NPC, and representatives of HKSAR members of the National Committee of the CPPCC ” in equal proportions. Such a composition is an expression of equal participation and broad representativeness. But the democrats and protestors accuse that this is not representative enough and it even is pro-Beijing.
The decision also requires that the chief executive to be elected by universal suffrage must be a person who loves the country and Hong Kong. As to “Hong Kong people governing Hong Kong”, late Chinese paramount leader Deng Xiaoping stressed that Hong Kong must be governed by the Hong Kong people with patriots as the mainstay, as loyalty to one’s country is the minimum political ethic for political figures. What’s more, the central leadership has the option of appointing or not appointing an elected chief executive leaving no loophole for a non-patriot to usurp the suffrage. The pan-democrats also oppose this. They know they have a skeleton in the wardrobe. In the previous election arrangement, a person might be nominated if 150 members in the Election Committee voted for them. Under the new rule, they have to get majority votes, or minimum 601 votes, from the members. They know well they do not have such high appealing in the 1200-member election committee. So they would rather fight against Beijing’s arrangement for the universal suffrage in 2017 although they never admitted it. It is selfish and against the tide of the age. It is also against the Constitution and the Basic Law.
The decision also draws the roadmap for the election of legislative council members by universal suffrage. It states that this can be gradually realized after the successful conduct of the election of chief executive by universal suffrage.
A Chinese government white paper on Hong Kong published in early June states that the Chinese central leadership continues its support for the HKSAR in developing a system of democratic governance that suits the actual conditions in Hong Kong in a gradual and orderly manner as provided for in the provisions of the Basic Law. It also noted that the high degree of autonomy of HKSAR is not an inherent power, but one that comes solely from the authorization by the central leadership. The high degree of autonomy is not full autonomy, nor a decentralized power. It is subject to the level of the central leadership’s authorization. There is no such thing called ”residual power” (for public nomination).
Foreign and Outside Intervention
The Chinese central government is aware of the fact that a very small number of people in Hong Kong who act in collusion with outside forces to interfere with the implementation of “ one country, two systems.”
In early April this year, former Hong Kong Legislative Council member Martin Lee and former Chief Secretary Anson Chan went to the U.S. to meet Vice President Joe Biden in the White House. This gave the so called democrats in Kong Kong a boost. Three month later, the duo went to London to mobilize support from the former ruler. They met Hugo Swire, minister of state at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Swire urged the pan-democrats to carry out “pro-democracy activities” and pledged to give them support. Unfortunately for the duo, during their meeting with members of the Committee on Foreign Affairs in the British Parliament, they were taught a lesson. The presenting MPs retorted their accusations by quoting the reports by Chatham House (Royal Institute of International Affairs, UK) that the Chinese central government has not shifted its Hong Kong policy. The MPs also remind the duo that the high degree of autonomy of Scotland is decided by the British parliament and every country require their lawyers, politicians and administrators loyal to their own country. The two were stunned.
Following these steps, the pan-democrats also sent prominent figures to Taiwan to learn from the “Taiwan independence” groups on how to carry out and street movements.
According to Wikileaks and Snowden files, Jimmy Lai, chairman of Next Media Ltd. in Hong Kong, whose tabloids put up pictures day after day of young women wearing little clothing has an intimate relation with the U.S. Consulate-General in Hong Kong. Lai became of paw of the U.S. to meddle in the political affairs of Hong Kong and to control the personnel affairs and major actions of pan-democrats. Eastweek, a Hong Kong monthly reported in June 19 that Lai met former U.S. Vice Defence Minister Paul Wolfowitz, secretly in Hong Kong in May. Wolfowitz was known as his hawkish stand toward China. But Lai played it down by saying meeting an old friend.
Recently Christ Patten, the last unelected Hong Kong governor, published an article on the Financial Times on September 2 claiming moral responsibility to Hong Kong. Showing no repentance for spreading thorns before leaving his post, he is openly challenging China. But what he is advised to sort out his own country’s messy record on the Scotland referendum. It is flawed democratic exercise. The rule of the game was laid down by London. The one million Scottish people residing outside Scotland were intentionally deprived the right to vote. They were most likely to vote for independence. While Foreigners from 27 European countries and from Commonwealth countries residing in Scotland were eligible for voting. As former head of the Conservative Party, Patten must explain his own party’s thinking on democracy in designing the referendum first. He should have this kind of domestic moral responsibility.
The Way Ahead
Hong Kong’s Long term prosperity and stability is an integral part of the Chinese dream. The NPC decision points out, since the long-term prosperity and stability of Hong Kong and the sovereignty, security and development interests of the country are at stake, there is a need for the political reform in Hong Kong to proceed in a prudent and steady manner. If any activity were carried out derailing the tract of rule of law, only anarchism and cheap populism would rule. Chinese President Xi Jinping said during his meeting with Hong Kong business people in Beijing that the central government’s basic principle and policy toward Hong Kong has not changed and will not change, adding that the central government will unswervingly implement the policy of “One Country, Two Systems” and the Basic Law, and support the steady development of democracy in Hong Kong. Xi expressed the hope that people from all circles in Kong Kong could make concerted efforts for a better future of the region and contribute to the modernization drive and the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
(The author is a government official in Beijing)

Achche din ahead for India and China, Millennium Post, September 18, 2014

Achche din ahead for India and China

http://www.millenniumpost.in/NewsContent.aspx?NID=69476

Achche din ahead for India and China
18 September 2014, New Delhi, Li Xiaojun
               
Historically the twin silk routes - stretching from west China to the Mediterranean and the Maritime Silk Route from Southeast China till the Gulf countries and even East African countries - were among the most important channels for exchanging goods and thoughts since ancient times.
They enriched the peoples and cultures involved. Chinese silk and tea brought brilliance and fragrance to the road, Buddhist scriptures made the road pious and sublime, music and dance from South and Central Asia expand the horizons of people’s cultural life. Today, Chinese President Xi Jinping wants to revitalise the twin silk roads.

China’s inner, poorer western part has experienced marked progress in terms of per capita GDP, reduction of poverty, development of infrastructure, health and education.  The second largest economy’s development came with a price. China is now increasingly encountering energy and environmental constraints and bottlenecks. In a sense, China is now at a crossroads. The responsibility for fulfilling the Chinese dream falls on the shoulders of President Xi.

But there are not many policy alternatives left. Xi has to move his face westward in China and is now presiding over the opening-up version 2.0. The twin silk roads initiative will make the western and southwestern Chinese engine the new phase of development. Western China has world class infrastructure, and is abundant in natural resources. It is high time to get it connected to central Asia, South Asia and Euro-Asia countries and its neighbour and the other giant economy in Asia, India.

Continued from pg 1...

India and a few Arab countries are the only regions where the footprint of twin silk roads can be found simultaneously outside China. In this sense, President Xi’s visit to India is also an important step in revitalizing both the land silk roads and the maritime silk roads. Actually China and India together, with more than a dozen Southeast Asian countries, have started to rebuild the ancient Nalanda University which was a giant influence in the silk roads history.

Besides mutual trade, investment and infrastructure development, China and India could tap the great potential of tourism. China has 47 UNESCO world heritage sites, while India has 29. Many of the 76 sites are related to the ancient silk roads. Chinese tourists have immense interest in the Indian Buddhist sites of which many are in north and central India and the ancient trading ports in Kerala. But there were only one Lakh Chinese tourists among its 10 Crores of outbound visitors coming to India last year while there were only 6 Lakh Indians who went to China, although we are close neighbors. If India built more hotels to lower the exorbitant prices, built better roads for fast and easy access to tourist spots, ran more power plants to reduce power cuts, and of course, build more public toilets, Chinese tourists will flock to India. Fortunately all of these are happening now and especially Xi since is visiting India.

No doubt, Xi is a very powerful leader in China. He is the only top leader who has the trinity role in the state, the CPC and the military. He is reforming China in an all-round way by putting forward the notion of the Chinese Dream. He has initiated the Silk Road Economic belt and the Maritime Silk Road in the age of globalisation. Similarly Modi is a resolute leader with remarkable charisma.
Frugal, clean and effective on social media, he looks like a saint, combining tradition and modernity.

He works so hard and so effectively for the betterment of the Indian people, domestically and for a bigger regional and international role for India. I am quite sure Xi’s visit to India is set to bring Sino-Indian relations to a new centre stage. The Achche Din for both our people is coming. The dream of India-China Bhai Bhai now seems like a reality.

Leaders with silken touch, Millennium Post, New Delhi, September 18, 2014

http://www.millenniumpost.in/NewsContent.aspx?NID=69406


Leaders with silken touch
18 September 2014, New Delhi, Li Xiaojun
               
Xi Jinping’s visit to India will bring Sino-Indian relations to much higher stage.
The world got to know China through silk in the ancient times. In the 4th century BC, Greece called China as ‘silk country’. Julius Caesar, the great Roman ruler, went to the theatre with a silk gown which aroused keen attention and interests among the audience. Since then, the price of silk rocketed and it even became as expensive as gold.

In the minds of Europeans, the faraway Middle Kingdom was associated with beautiful connotations: fantastic, rich and glittering. when German geographer Ferdinand von Richthofen was doing his research on the ancient routes connecting the East and the West one century ago, he came up with the word ‘Seidenstrassen’, namely the ‘silk roads’. The land, silk roads stretched from west China to the Mediterranean and the Maritime Silk Road started from Southeast China and reached Gulf countries and even East African countries.

Historically the twin silk roads were among the most important routes for exchanging goods and thoughts. They enriched the peoples and cultures involved. Chinese silk and tea brought brilliance and fragrance to the road, Buddhist scriptures made the road pious and sublime, music and dance from South Asia and Central Asia enriched people’s cultural life. It was through the Silk Road that the Chinese inventions of paper-making, gun powder, movable type printing press and compass were spread to Europe via the Arab region and that the Arabian and Indian astronomy, calendar, Buddhism and Islam, plants and herbal medicines were introduced to China. Today, Chinese President Xi Jinping wants to revitalise the twin silk roads.

Xi’s State Policy
Xi Jinping proposed the Silk Road Economic Belt on a visit to Kazakhstan in September 2013. He proposed that China and central Asian countries must work to improve traffic connectivity, trade and monetary cooperation, and people-to-people exchanges. Xi also proposed a 21st century Maritime Silk Road during his visit to Indonesia in October 2013. The proposals were unanimously accepted as the policy of the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC) during its plenary session held in late 2013. The initiative was then adopted by China’s top legislature, the National People’s Congress, in its annual session held in March this year. Therefore, Xi’s ideas to promote the modern time twin silk roads have become the official policy pursued by both the CPC and the state. The initiative has thus become a rallying point to mobilise central government and provincial government agencies to put in their respective resources to materialise it.

Strategic Implications
As a Chinese saying goes, ‘To succeed one has to take advantage of the opportunity, geographic proximity and good-neighbourly relations’. Xi was fully aware of this. His idea is based on solid domestic and international calibrations. Late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping put forward the opening-up and reform policy in late 1978. Deng’s initiative has become a driving force for China to become the 2nd largest economy from a backward and poor country in a time span of three decades. It has helped lifting tens of millions of people out of poverty. But it is the eastern and southern coastal regions that have benefited the most.

The gap between eastern China and western China has increased. To narrow the gap, former President Jiang Zemin put forward the ‘Develop the West’ policy a decade ago. Since then, China’s inner, poor western part has experienced marked progress in terms of per capita GDP, reduction of poverty, development of infrastructure, health and education. The 2nd largest economy came with a price. China is now increasingly encountering energy and environmental constraints and bottlenecks. In a sense, China is now on a cross road. The responsibility for fulfilling the Chinese dream falls on the shoulders of Xi. But there are not many policy alternatives left. Xi has to move his head westward and is now presiding over the opening-up of version 2.0. The twin silk roads initiative will make the western and southwestern China, engines for  the new phase of development. These regions have great potential for development.

This interior part will transform from a backyard to the face of opportunities. But it did not start from scratch. Western China has world class infrastructure, abundant in natural resources. It is high time to connect it to Central Asia, South Asia and other Euro-Asian countries. Obviously, Xi plans to use the silk roads as means to rejuvenate the nation. Silk roads are like a spread folding fan with China as the pivot. China has the need, the will and the ability to implement the grand blueprint.

In contrast, although Japan and the United States came up with the idea of silk road strategies in late 1990s and in 2012, when former US secretary of State Hillary Clinton emphasised its importance  but they have fatal defections and  China was intentionally avoided. Majority of the US troops are set to pull out of Afghanistan by yearend and the American idea seems  dull and pale. It is not difficult to understand how far their strategies can be carried forward.

 The twin silk roads have several mechanisms and platforms in place. First and foremost, it is the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). It is an effective tool for enhancing regional cooperation and tackling terrorism, separatism and religious extremism. Other such initiatives are the Euro-Asia Expo held annually in Urumuqi, Xinjiang Autonomous Region, the South Asia Expo held in Kunming, Yunnan Province and the China-ASEAN Expo held in Nanjing in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.

Second,  comes the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCIM ) Corridor, the China-Pakistan Corridor, the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence (Panchsheel). The international railways link Chongqing, the 4th largest city along the Yangtze River and Zhengzhou in central China with ports in Germany, Poland and Holland come fourth. Fifth, are the energy corridors that have come into shape between China and central Asian countries and the pipelines between China and Myanmar. On the sixth slot is the BRICS New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Bank which is coming into being and with China having a  prominent role in each of them, it’s not difficult for them to provide financing for relevant programs. As to the Maritime Silk Road, it seems more difficult to promote. Thus China has to make great efforts to cement relations with countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Myanmar, Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Maldives and the Gulf countries.

China and India
India and a few Arab countries are the only regions where the footprint of twin silk roads can be found simultaneously outside China. In this sense, President Xi’s visit to India is also an important step in revitalising both the land silk roads and the maritime silk roads. Actually, China and India together with more than a dozen Southeast Asian countries have started to rebuild the ancient Nalanda University which was indispensable in the silk roads history. Besides mutual trade, investment and infrastructure development, China and India could tap the great potential of tourism.

China has 47 UNESCO world heritage sites, while India has 29. Many of the 76 sites are related to the ancient silk roads. Chinese tourists have immense interests in the Indian Buddhist sites which are in north and central India and around the ancient trading ports of Kerala.

But there were only one lakh Chinese tourists among its 10 crores of outbound visitors coming to India last year while there were only six lakh Indians who went to China although we are close neighbours. If India builds more hotels to lower the exorbitant price, it should build better roads for fast and easy access to tourists spots, run more power plants to achieve less power cuts, and of course build more public toilets. Do this and the Chinese tourists will flock to India. Fortunately all of these are happening at about the same time as Xi is visiting India.

No doubt, Xi is a very powerful leader in China. He is the only top leader who has the trinity role in the state, the CPC and the military. He is reforming China in an all-round way by putting forward the notion of Chinese Dream. Quite particularly he has started cleaning up corruption with determination as a way to reform politics. He has called on to catch, both the tigers and flies in the fight against corruption. On the strategic and economic front, he has initiated the Silk Road Economic belt and the Maritime Silk Road in the age of globalisation. Similarly, Modi is a resolute leader with markable charisma. Frugal, clean and good at Facebook, he looks like a saint combining tradition and modernity. He works so hard and so effectively for the betterment of the Indian people domestically and for India’s bigger regional and international roles. I am quite sure Xi’s visit of India is set to bring the Sino-Indian relations to a new stage. The achche din for both our people are on their way.

The author is director at the State Council Information Office, China


June 06, 2013

China's CBSE starts today

China's CBSE starts today: June 7-9

July 12, 2012

The Hindu: Muddying the Waters-The Dalai Lama Cheating the World

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/article3616701.ece The Hindu: Muddying the waters-The Dalai Lama Misleading the World


The Hindu:
July 10, 2012

Letter to the Editor

Muddying the Waters



The Dalai Lama refused to call self-immolations wrong in an interview published by The Hindu on July 9. Then readers may ask him what compassion really means to him. His prayers for those self-immolators amount to encouragement of the violent deed.




As to autonomy, the Dalai Lama’s views totally contradict the Chinese Constitution. Ethnic Regional Autonomy and people’s representative system are the norms for ethnic minorities to exercise autonomy. He advocates “Greater Tibet” which is a legacy of the British imperialists to split China. It’s against the Constitution too. No Tibetan living in the Tibet Autonomous Region and autonomous prefectures buys his argument. With an ulterior motive, the Dalai Lama has been muddying the waters with regard to reincarnation. His disguised “independence” drive is doomed to failure.



Li Xiaojun,



First Secretary, Press Section,



Embassy of P.R. China in India,



New Delhi



Keywords: Dalai Lama interview, Tibet self immolation, Tibetan movement